Andrew Huberman· PhD
But by understanding how birds do it, we can now start to think, can we reawaken these pathways in mammals, in humans? And can we do it in a very precise fashion so that we turn them on when needed and turn them off afterwards?
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
But by understanding how birds do it, we can now start to think, can we reawaken these pathways in mammals, in humans? And can we do it in a very precise fashion so that we turn them on when needed and turn them off afterwards?
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.