Andrew Huberman· PhD
Whether this is due to sunlight or to viewing things at a distance, or both, is not clear, but the takeaway action is.
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Whether this is due to sunlight or to viewing things at a distance, or both, is not clear, but the takeaway action is.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
that's called society in 2021 is children looking at screens near objects for hours on end and not going outside there are two drivers of nearsightedness in the plastic developing human number one uh deprivation from outdoor light and number two near work