Peter Attia· MD
Which is interesting because if you implanted two, let's do the math. You're talking about 50% chance. That's right. I was going to say twins. Yeah. Which is high. Too high. We just can't take that risk.
Loading…
We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
Which is interesting because if you implanted two, let's do the math. You're talking about 50% chance. That's right. I was going to say twins. Yeah. Which is high. Too high. We just can't take that risk.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Which is interesting because if you implanted two, let's do the math. You're talking about 50% chance. That's right. I was just going to say twins. Yeah. Which is high. Too high. We just can't take that risk.