The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I mean, I think one of the features of being a healthy human is being able to like, oh, like, hey, you know, it was a great cup of coffee this afternoon, but also um register the serotonergic like, ah, that experiment failed again. But then when things are working again, you can kind of feel like get some motivation from that and not just think about the PhD as the reward, right?
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.