The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I think there's it depends on your risk as well if you're lowrisk you're not eating a lot of these Ultra processed foods you're probably okay um but a lot of kids you know we have control over our children's diets only to a certain point and then they go off to middle school and start eating the Takis and the Doritos and you know they make maybe some bad choices and so if you want their teeth as protected as possible I'd suggest cence
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.