Andrew Huberman· PhD
in the past we were diagnosing kids at nine or 10 years of age right and now clinicians are able to reliably diagnose kids um at two to three years of age right
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
in the past we were diagnosing kids at nine or 10 years of age right and now clinicians are able to reliably diagnose kids um at two to three years of age right
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.