The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if carbon dioxide were not in the environment we would be all living on a 30 degree surface of the earth and none of us would be alive and the carbon dioxide that's in the environment is the the it's what plants inspire and they then fix it into carbon dioxide
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if carbon dioxide were not in the environment we would be all living on a 30 degree surface of the earth and none of us would be alive