The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I coined that phrase almost 30 years ago and now people study it like it's a phenomenon which is cool in a sense but also I kind of want to keep reminding them like that's a word that refers to a process it's not a thing it's a process and the but the process is so when the brain is a category Constructor how fine grained are the categories how precise are the categories
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.