The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the definitions themselves were designed with a child population in mind because until roughly the mid90s it was Dogma that this was a dis neurodevelopmental disease of childhood and that every child who had it outgrew it that is dramatically wrong um some kids do most kids don't the latest work suggests that most adults fluctuate in time with the severity of their ADHD symptoms
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.