The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
what they showed after following them for 20 years so a long period of time was that those women that were out in the sun not only had lower all cause mortality but they also had lower cardiovascular mortality and what's really interesting is they had lower cancer mortality and it was in a dose response curve which suggests Bradford Hill criteria that there was maybe some causation here
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
And the data on all reduced all cause mortality um in people that get a lot of sunlight. I I saw a study out of Sweden looks very very solid, but more data is needed clearly. Yeah. So, >> I think that that story um there was a story out of Sweden. There was also a story out of the University of East Anglia and um we're talking big numbers, you know, we're talking very big numbers on that.