We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
When your doctor only has one type of med when your doctor says no, you can't have anything, that's suspect. If your doctor says you can only have this really expensive product that has to be uh uh uh inserted into your butt uh four times a year and you have to pay me thousands of dollars, that's extremely suspect. Compounded by me. If they say you have to pay lots of money for this special compounded product that's safer and more effective, I call red flag on that situation.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.