The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
don't blame them don't blame yourself say there's a policy there's a rule there's a law how it looks to people is do this instead of doing that so that behavior and if you keep doing that behavior here's what the consequence is
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and this may be the most important with high conflict people because they one of their biggest problems is they don't stop themselves they keep going in areas where most people stop themselves they keep talking they talk a lot they create a problem and keep creating the problem they don't stop and so people around them have to stop them
and with high conflict people you often have to tell them the consequence when you set the limit and be ready to impose the consequence