The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
one is that you know probably about 10% of the male genome is devoted to reproduction and so it makes sense given that we only have about you know 24,000 genes in the body that there's a lot of um you know overlap so one gene that plays a role in reproduction may play a role in you the cardiovascular system or the neurological system
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.