The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So, so we we systematically intentionally bred for that like a couple hundred years ago. And then we have the the ones that don't show much of the predatory sequence at all that simply mostly just eat uh which are are the um what do you call them? The ones that that um help uh livestock guardians. they they still like the sniffing. So they tend to retain the sniffing part and then specific breeds will
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.