Andrew Huberman· PhD
so clearly they weren't those people who make up data were not in science for discovery of Truth as best we can understand it they were into it for something else
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so clearly they weren't those people who make up data were not in science for discovery of Truth as best we can understand it they were into it for something else
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
she said, you know, why would any scientist make up data? It's crazy, right? You're trying to figure out what's true.