The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if you look at your nail bed some people that have bunions the nail bed will be flat and it'll just look like it's adducting all right so the here's the bunion oh I see what you mean y right but the nail bed is flat when you see that it's typically from Footwear
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
If you look at your nail bed, some people that have bunions, the nail bed will be flat and it'll just look like it's adducting. Right. So the here is the bunion. >> Oh, I see what you mean. Yeah. >> Right. But the nail bed is flat. When you see that, it's typically from footwear.