The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
loss aversion is this observation that if I give you a 50-50 gamble like win some money lose some money um in general for most people I have to offer them a lot more to win than to lose for them to take the gamble which doesn't make any sense you know rationally and economically it should be it's it's it's even chances so people are loss averse
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.