The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
in these couple experiments we did when we randomly assigned people to learn both that their jobs were malleable and that their skills were malleable — they got a sustainable boost to their happiness that lasted at least six months there was no cost to their performance — meaning you could to redesign your own job to be more enjoyable without — without a drop in the effectiveness of your contributions — to your workplace
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.