The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
And by the way, I haven't seen that data. Uh, you know, and there is no data on biased in in large trials that's going to really tell me what it does. And so, and we're going to just use this. Um, and that's what got people through for a while.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
But we don't have you know where we are now we have lots of options. We have FDA approved options and they're covered by insurance most of the time. So I tend I don't prescribe it because I haven't needed to.