Andrew Huberman· PhD
You want to keep making errors for this period of time that I'm saying will last anywhere for about 7 to 30 minutes.
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
You want to keep making errors for this period of time that I'm saying will last anywhere for about 7 to 30 minutes.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
something happens in the error the getting wrong of certain things that cues your nervous system to lock in the information that you have right and to remember what you have wrong so that you then correct it
keep making those errors for 7 to 30 minutes just keep making those errors and drill through it and you're almost seeking frustration and if you can find some pleasure and the frustration yes that is a state that exists
you have to fail many times within the same session and those failures will cue your attention to the appropriate sensory events