Andrew Huberman· PhD
But what we found in the largest study that we've done to date is most users are using it in a very responsible um and directed way where they're not using it to get this high or euphoria or or seditive feel.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
But what we found in the largest study that we've done to date is most users are using it in a very responsible um and directed way where they're not using it to get this high or euphoria or or seditive feel.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So I think I think most people that are ingesting it or utilizing it know that they're utilizing it. I think they know they're specifically going after it.