Peter Attia· MD
but it's interesting right when you think about it because it means that we have a bias system in the publication realm that it we are biased towards positive findings that are often untrue
Loading…
We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
but it's interesting right when you think about it because it means that we have a bias system in the publication realm that it we are biased towards positive findings that are often untrue
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.