The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so you have three things you got one you have a population who is in a lot of pain uh you have few ways to deal with that pain that are more productive not a lot of options and then three you have a substance that solves that pain that problem in the short term immediately
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and I think you see it here in the US as well it's like why did the opioid epidemic start in states where the factories had moved out well it's because factories move out our lives change we don't have a lot of resources things have gotten really dark and now we have this flood of pills that can take away those problems in the short term that can allow us to escape from that life we live