Andrew Huberman· PhD
he had very serious concerns, health concerns, about x-rays because he understood the physics and he understood enough biology that, he was actually quite vocal about his, dislike of dental technology and its dangers.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
he had very serious concerns, health concerns, about x-rays because he understood the physics and he understood enough biology that, he was actually quite vocal about his, dislike of dental technology and its dangers.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.