Andrew Huberman· PhD
So I would say up to six is normal >> and people in their 40s >> less than one
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
So I would say up to six is normal >> and people in their 40s >> less than one
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
after probably late 20s it starts declining.
So, a woman who's older. But what's the difference between a 16-year-old girl who probably could get pregnant if she walked past a guy versus That never happens, by the way. Oh, okay. Good. Um, no, but if you have like a 16-year-old girl who is at the peak of her fertility versus a 30-year-old woman who is still fertile but has lost a step, like what's the difference in am? Yeah, it's a very narrow range, right? So, like above two, we consider that's probably normal reproductive. Above two is two effectively. Now it can be high too in patients with PCOS for example have very high levels okay but different thing but above two you know that's usually good number of eggs less than one low number