Andrew Huberman· PhD
because if you're not if you haven't lost a chess game in two years you're not taking your [ __ ] on you're finding people who you can beat and you're only playing against them right
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
because if you're not if you haven't lost a chess game in two years you're not taking your [ __ ] on you're finding people who you can beat and you're only playing against them right
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.