The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and there's there's one kind of weakness that i'd i'd like to see them work on and maybe they will and that's this because of the breeding scheme that they use all of the mice have the same mitochondria no matter how genetically diverse they are they all have the same mitochondria and we now know that the mitochondrial genotype because it interacts so closely with the nuclear genotype can have a huge impact
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.