Rhonda Patrick· PhD
the answer is unequivocally no it does not so when you do the Mr you get the answer that the Epi is clearly confounding with something else which is in other words low LDL at the population level is a proxy for other illness
We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
the answer is unequivocally no it does not so when you do the Mr you get the answer that the Epi is clearly confounding with something else which is in other words low LDL at the population level is a proxy for other illness
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.