The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
The the lie in that was that you know cannabis had some unique role um you know that was going to lead you to use heroin use. But the truth is anything like you know if you're a teenager and you start smoking or you start drinking or you start uh you know using cannabis or or you know stealing prescription opioids from your parents or whatever that will increase your likelihood of progressing to other substances
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
but there really isn't anything that proves that cannabis is a game 'we drug