The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
supplements like that are used as a tool when you actually have normal testing and you have to look that woman in the face and say listen you're metabolizing a lot of this into 4 o H + 16 o H and you know in that situation you might say you know let's put you on dim or this or that and it's used as a tool but just blanket you know across the board for everybody I don't I don't think that's the answer
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.