Peter Attia· MD
those with the lowest igf-1 level leave twice as long those are already two centenarians but only women men do not in every example that I gave you there's a sex difference
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
those with the lowest igf-1 level leave twice as long those are already two centenarians but only women men do not in every example that I gave you there's a sex difference
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
those with the lowest half of igf-1 lived twice as long as those with the highest level of igf-1 and that's females only or both sexes that's females only
is igf1 level predicts their longevity and remember centenarians are likely to die 30% of them are going to die each year so a so those with the lowest half of igf1 lived twice as long as those with the highest level of igf-1 and that's females only or both sexes that's females only okay
igf levels have a j curve with mortality and therefore very very high levels of igf must be problematic
is igf1 level predicts their longevity and remember centenarians are likely to die 30% of them are going to die each year so er so those with the lowest half of igf1 Liv twice as long as those with the highest level of igf-1
showing a U-shaped relationship between igf-1 levels and mortality both very high and very low igf-1 were linked to higher death rates