The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
And so there's this always this sort of um paradoxical description of of uh cretam or or as we say in the United States. um where you get this stimulant effect at lower doses or or smaller amounts and you get this more euphoric or seditive like opioid like effect if you will at higher doses and so they they tend to use that traditionally.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
as you've pointed out it's not one thing it's just not and um maybe just for the moment let's step back in light of that and let me just ask you said earlier that when people use the plant at lower dosages it's a bit of a stimulant right? >> Might even have some aphrodisiac um qualities to it which suggests to me I'm not a a medicinal chemist as you are but suggests that there might be some dopamineergic >> um maybe some chonergic maybe some vasoddil dilation activity given the aphrodisiac part etc.
So it you know I I earlier said it's kind of nature's Viagra but it's not interacting with the phosphodiestase pathways. >> It's not causing vasoddilation that we are aware of which is what Viagra basically does.