The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
what if instead we said who is the type of person i wish to be what is the identity that i'd like to have and in fact we could even ask like um the person who has that identity what kind of habits would they have and then we use that identity to inform the process the habits and we let the outcomes come naturally
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the second person says oh no thanks i'm not a smoker now technically they've done the same thing they've both turned down the cigarette but the second person kind of has signaled a shift in identity change like they the first person is trying to be something they're not no thanks i'm trying to quit and the second person is saying i'm not a smoker it's just not something that i do
what if instead we said who is the type of person I wish to be what is the identity that I'd like to have and in fact we could even ask like um the person who has that identity what kind of habits would they have and then we use that identity to inform the process the habits and we let the outcomes come naturally
What if instead we said, "Who is the type of person I wish to be? What is the identity that I'd like to have?"