The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Even though the scientific evidence was that there was no scientific evidence that that demonstrated that if you had the COVID vaccine, you were less of a threat to other people as far as spreading COVID than uh if you hadn't had the COVID vaccine, specifically for people who had already had COVID and recovered and weren't vaccinated.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.