The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So you can think of this accumulated hydraulic pressure either being based on something that you were deprived of creating an accumulating need, or something that you want to do building up a drive or a pressure to do that,
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
One of the, excuse me, one of the concepts that you've raised in your lectures before and that I think was Hess's idea is this idea of a sort of hydraulic pressure. - Mm-hmm. - Or maybe it was Konrad, I can't speak now. [David laughing] Excuse me, Konrad Lorenz, pardon.