The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
But there are aspects of neuroplasticity that have nothing to do with impairments. I mean earlier I said we're all walking around with this map, this representation of the world around us so we can see edges, we can see colors, except for folks that are color blind of course, and we also have a map of emotional experience. We have a map of whether or not certain people are trustworthy, certain people aren't trustworthy.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.