The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
counterclockwise and these were people who were 80 oh 80 okay excuse me now but also that was when um 80 was 80 not the new 60 they were old in fact I remember when we were interviewing I was interviewing people to see if they can be in the study so um they're down the hall I'm in my office and I see them and they look like they're not going to make it down the hall to the office
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.