The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
we sort of taken two and a half years to build this program this curriculum and it's an investment I make no you know it's probably 30 hours of video uh plus tons of downloadable material that are you know lead you through a bunch of exercises you have to do like how to take a correct family history like what to really look for in your family history um stuff like we're talking about the blood pressure Stuff how to check the labs and all those things
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.