The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
by far almost universally the farther away in time the thing is the more it is discounted forward or backward mostly forward the reason is straightforward in any explore exploit Paradigm like with decision-making the structure of the equations and equivalencies are all related to how one views or values future rewards it gets even Messier when the future reward is unknown or probabilistic
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.