The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
What's also really interesting is that there isn't a primary cancer of the inner ear. - Hmm. - And that's really cool. That's another - Mm-hmm. - fascinating thing that - Mm-hmm. - could be used to potentially even develop new cancer therapies - Mm-hmm. - since there is an organ that doesn't get it.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
There can be cancer of the outer ear, which is the auricle or the ear canal, but we're really talking about the inner ear.