The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
you know what interesting they've they've looked at this and I don't know that we have a great answer for the exact physcal mechanisms we know it's tied to mitochondrial density mitochondrial function we know it's tied to elements of the immune system we know it's tied to hormonal status we obviously see decreases and all those things as we age so there's probably you have to wonder which ones are causal and which ones are the resp I don't think we I don't think we know that
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
you know interesting they've they've looked at this and I don't know that we have a great answer for the exact physcal mechanism we know it's tied to mitochondrial density mitochondrial function we know it's tied to elements of the immune system we know it's tied to hormonal status we obviously see decreases and all those things as we age