The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
There were a dozen randomized trials on flu before the pandemic and none of there was a Cochran report looking at the literature the random at on on masking and influenza and they and they concluded that the evidence was weak at best that these kinds of cloth masking at at in population settings actually prevent anyone the spread of influenza.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.