The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
And we had this conversation, I think, in the Bay Area. A lot of these big companies like Google and Facebook and these companies actually pay for their employees to freeze their eggs. They're smart, right? They don't want their employees to get pregnant. They're like, "I'll pay for your egg freezing. Keep working."
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
What data supports is that when companies do leverage a fertility package and their benefits, they retain employees longer, employees are happier, and more people utilize the service than would without it.
the often the time when you would freeze your eggs when it would give you the highest rate of return, you don't have the resources to do so. So having a company that's able to come in and do that is really I think impactful.