Peter Attia· MD
I just think we have the luxury of knowing that basically whatever we know today is you know quite likely to not be entirely true tomorrow
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I just think we have the luxury of knowing that basically whatever we know today is you know quite likely to not be entirely true tomorrow
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
it's sort of one of my little tongue-in-cheek comments but you know all facts have a half-life and some of those half-lives can be quite short but it is interesting to see this because it's been about ten years that I've been paying attention to this and these things typically do occur on five year cycles