The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So, you know, what an evolutionary perspective brings to bear, is evolved function and ultimate explanation, the selective forces that created adaptations, the functions of those adaptations, and the neuroscience brings well, what is the underlying machinery that these mechanisms are instantiated in?
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
I think you're absolutely right and and I think it it will happen. I think it's starting to happen and it and it will happen because uh getting at the neuroscience is getting at the underlying mechanisms that are driving the process. So you know what an evolutionary perspective brings to bear is is evolved function um and ultimate explanation the selective forces that created adaptations the functions of those adaptations and the neuroscience brings well what is the underlying machinery that these mechanisms are instantiated in