The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if if somebody actually truly has mold growing in their lungs we should be able to see that on a CAT scan we should be able to identify it we should be able to go and biopsy it we should be able to go and collect it and if that's exactly what grows out on the culture after we take a biopsy or culture we can tailor antifungals for that particular thing
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
if somebody actually truly has mold growing in their lungs we should be able to see that on a CAT scan we should be able to identify it we should be able to go and biopsy it we should be able to go and collect it and if that's exactly what grows out on the culture after we take a biopsy or culture we can tailor antifungals for that particular thing