The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so uh you know males have these big canines and they have sort of you know physical dominant features very square jaw all that kind of stuff and um and and females for example in Max display their state uh they their hormonal State how receptive they are to mating and and likelihood of of ovulating at that time through the sort of the swelling and coloration on their perineum
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.