Andrew Huberman· PhD
if the NIH supports a scientist's work and then that work leads to a journal publication that uh that that publication ought to be available free to the public immediately upon publication.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
if the NIH supports a scientist's work and then that work leads to a journal publication that uh that that publication ought to be available free to the public immediately upon publication.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
You're not allowed as an NI funded scientist to publish in a journal that doesn't have that as a policy.
And so starting in July that what you just said will no longer be the case. Americans and everybody will be have access to the papers that the Americans are already paid for from the that if they're NIH funded uh for free.