The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and firm doesn't mean harsh it just means try to end the Hostile conversation so don't respond to their distortions maybe even when they say you've done this or misinformation or hostility is just give them a Biff response
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
give them what we call a Biff response that's brief informative just straight information don't tell them you're wrong just tell them what the information is and do it in a friendly Manner and have it be firm have it end the discussion
and we teach this as an email method and we estimate there's about a million people doing Biff now because we taught it to about half a million people professionals and individuals we've got four little Biff books we've got brief informative friendly and firm firm and those four things