The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Social media is an interesting one because the amount of dopamine that's released in response to logging onto social media initially could be quite high but it seems like likely that there's a taper in the amount of dopamine and yet people still get addicted.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
social media is an interesting one because the amount of dopamine that's released in response to logging onto social media initi could be quite high but it seems like likely that there's a taper in the amount of dopamine but and yet people still get addicted